![]() ![]() Like BIAB they have an impossible user interface. 3 Jazz versions, 2 acoustic guitars, piano, rock, drums, blues, EDM, House, Country, Ukelele, The apps normally go for $9 but often go on sale. Set up your chords in the app and it triggers the loops. It's high quality loop recordings of top UK studio musicians. If this kind of thing intrigues you, the iPad/iPhone SessionBand series is much cheaper and does something very similar. ![]() I wouldn't put it on the radio but it made him happy. To make it work in a way that I found musical I did a ton of comps of variations of its realtracks algorithms so I would have some control of what it was playing. I do admit that I arranged a country song for a friend with their steel guitar, and fiddle, but it was a nightmare. Or if you like, you can leave in some of their tracks. You put it in your DAW, play your own music and take BIAB out. In no time at all you can block the song out and put in the introduction, verses, choruses, breaks, instrumental, endings, etc. ![]() You put in your chords and try a bunch of different genres. I have also found it useful for exploring ideas in songwriting. I have used it off and on since it was originally introduced. much much more well spent than buying construction kits, which are just static blocks without flow. I have played around it for 20 years, and it could really help theatrical cues etc. There simply are no Youtube videos which show what this thing can do, as people making those videos are more interested on showing how their playing sounds over it (thus not focusing on excellent arrangement part of BIAB).Ĭome to think of this praising, I guess Im really going to order it for myself finally. Its a tool which deserves much more attention than what it has ever got. You get lots of benefits from that arranging beast when you simply export playback to DAW for additional programming. When paired with VSTs and DAW you can create extremely realistic tracks in minutes instead of hours or days. If you are in need for getting quick results on pop/rock/jazz/blues tracks for professional backingtracks or media cues (radio/tv), you really should consider using BIAB. Just released 2017 edition has done some facelifting, but you are still looking at something that looks like from 90s. Its like a dynamite was throw to layout and all the million pieces were glued together. The thing simply is that midi programming and vst pairing needs more knowledge and work, and they chose to try get better sounding results for people who just want to get quick results easier.Īdditionally, program itself is an example of an worst kind of UI design. Still, I would prefer they would have put more effort on midi side, as improvisation and styling engine is excellent. With some clever programming those loops really sound good, no matter which chords and structural changes you throw together, be it half measures, bridges / anything. The cons are there too - PG has taken the path of realtracks, which are basically amazing sounding loops. Its a great tool for creating complete backing tracks, but it has nothing to offer for orchestral cinematic scoring. It shines on reallyclever engine which enables it to play unique solos (generated on the fly) and backing tracks (think of it as an AI based on music theory, using preset styles as guidelines for style it tries to match up to). Its also good for sketching backing tracks cue just needs that jazz/blues/ballad style.īIAB is mainly good for jazz, swing, big band, motown, rock, fusion, classic disco, county (+folk/bluegrass) and other more traditional band arrangements. I think it's a really underrated piece of software, as it can be used for many different purposes. He plays a guitar over BIAB live playback, filled with singer. My dad is a BIAB professional, having done hundreds of gigs (maybe over 500?) for over 20 years, ever since old DOS version.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |